admin管理员组

文章数量:1429927

We use John Resig´s inherit.js. And that gives us access to the convenient _super() function to call the parent´s function. That´s awesome, but today I was stumped by a problem, I couldn´t call this._super() from inside a setTimeout, even if I bound this:

Code example

var Person = Class.extend({
  init: function(isDancing){
  this.dancing = isDancing;
},
    dance: function(){
        return this.dancing;
    }
});

var Ninja = Person.extend({
    init: function(){
        this._super( false );
},
dance: function(){
    window.setTimeout(function(){
        // Call the inherited version of dance()
        return this._super();
    }.bind(this),50);
});

this._super() is undefined! What is going on?

We use John Resig´s inherit.js. And that gives us access to the convenient _super() function to call the parent´s function. That´s awesome, but today I was stumped by a problem, I couldn´t call this._super() from inside a setTimeout, even if I bound this:

Code example

var Person = Class.extend({
  init: function(isDancing){
  this.dancing = isDancing;
},
    dance: function(){
        return this.dancing;
    }
});

var Ninja = Person.extend({
    init: function(){
        this._super( false );
},
dance: function(){
    window.setTimeout(function(){
        // Call the inherited version of dance()
        return this._super();
    }.bind(this),50);
});

this._super() is undefined! What is going on?

• javascript
• inheritance
• settimeout

Share Improve this question Follow asked Sep 26, 2013 at 12:07 jrewingjrewing 15588 bronze badges

Add a ment  | 

2 Answers 2

Sorted by: Reset to default 5

To make this work you need to capture the _super method while in the subclassed method, like this:

dance: function(){
    // capture the super method for later usage
    var superMethod = this._super;
    window.setTimeout(function(){
        return superMethod();
    },50);
};

The reason this works, and your code does not, is that the extend() method in inherit.js captures the superclass' method as this._super right before your overridden method is run. It then runs your code, and after your code has run it restores _super to whatever it was set to before it ran. The action takes place in the following bit of code from inherit.js

      var tmp = this._super;

      // Add a new ._super() method that is the same method
      // but on the super-class
      this._super = _super[name];

      // The method only need to be bound temporarily, so we
      // remove it when we're done executing
      var ret = fn.apply(this, arguments);        
      this._super = tmp;

      return ret;

So to be more specific; when the original code was run, the function that was used as a parameter to setTimeout was bound to the original object. The reason it did not work was that, even though this referenced the right object, this._super referenced something else, since this._super was reset to point to whatever it pointed to before the method was run. Probably it was not set, so the value of this._super was most likely just undefined.

This shows how ugly Class is implemented. The _super property will just be available during the time dance does run, and is removed (or restored) thereafter as it needs to be specific to the currently executing method. You will need to get the reference to the "current" _super value, and call that from the timeout. In short:

dance: function(){
    // Call the inherited version of dance()
    window.setTimeout( this._super.bind(this), 50);
}

本文标签： javascriptcalling thissuper() from inside setTimeout()Stack Overflow